header-logo header-logo

03 January 2008 / Simon Young
Issue: 7302 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Profession , Employment
printer mail-detail

A Class Act

Intensive lobbying and government backtracking have transformed the Legal Services Act, says Simon Young

The Legal Services Act 2007 (LSA 2007) received Royal Assent on 30 October 2007, and the scene was set for what is arguably going to be the most fundamental change ever in the structure of the provision of legal services.

Previous articles in this journal (see 156 NLJ 7238, pp 1304–06, 7239, pp 1351–52 and 7240, pp 1391–93) set the scene by outlining the main provisions in the Bill at a relatively early stage in its life. Followers of the legislative process will, however, have been fascinated by the number and scope of the late changes made to the Bill, mostly at the behest of the government. The surprising thing about this was that many of those changes were reversals of previous government policy, even though there had been previous defeats of opposition-led amendments. It was an unusual instance of a government which had clearly listened to a sustained period of well-argued lobbying by many—not least the Law

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll