header-logo header-logo

03 January 2008 / Simon Young
Issue: 7302 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Profession , Employment
printer mail-detail

A Class Act

Intensive lobbying and government backtracking have transformed the Legal Services Act, says Simon Young

The Legal Services Act 2007 (LSA 2007) received Royal Assent on 30 October 2007, and the scene was set for what is arguably going to be the most fundamental change ever in the structure of the provision of legal services.

Previous articles in this journal (see 156 NLJ 7238, pp 1304–06, 7239, pp 1351–52 and 7240, pp 1391–93) set the scene by outlining the main provisions in the Bill at a relatively early stage in its life. Followers of the legislative process will, however, have been fascinated by the number and scope of the late changes made to the Bill, mostly at the behest of the government. The surprising thing about this was that many of those changes were reversals of previous government policy, even though there had been previous defeats of opposition-led amendments. It was an unusual instance of a government which had clearly listened to a sustained period of well-argued lobbying by many—not least the Law

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll