header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
03 December 2009 / Roger Birch
Issue: 7396 / Categories: Features , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

A class apart

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Part one: Roger Birch examines the increasing determination for certain recreational drugs to be advertised as legal

The recreational drug market is on a continual quest for drugs that can be advertised as “legal” and consequently in recent years the term “legal highs” has been adopted. However, the use of the term “legal highs” cannot be applied to all of the so-called products. This new and developing market has attempted to provide substances which fall outside the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 (MDA 1971), Sch 2 as amended. The Schedule lists a number of drugs which have been divided into the categories of class A, B and C depending upon the perceived seriousness of a particular drug.

MDA 1971 is the legal front line in the war on what are known as illegal drugs. Hence the development of the so called “legal highs” which is an attempt to make money out of substances not listed in MDA 1971, Sch 2.

The public perception of drugs

There is a public perception in the UK that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: No such thing as a ‘Welsh seat’
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
NLJ this week: Jury reform risks justice for efficiency’s sake
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
NLJ this week: Crypto fightback offers ‘new frontier for law’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
NLJ this week: Time to revive the duty to report crime?
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
NLJ this week: When are experts truly ‘necessary’?
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll