header-logo header-logo

03 December 2009 / Roger Birch
Issue: 7396 / Categories: Features , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

A class apart

Part one: Roger Birch examines the increasing determination for certain recreational drugs to be advertised as legal

The recreational drug market is on a continual quest for drugs that can be advertised as “legal” and consequently in recent years the term “legal highs” has been adopted. However, the use of the term “legal highs” cannot be applied to all of the so-called products. This new and developing market has attempted to provide substances which fall outside the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 (MDA 1971), Sch 2 as amended. The Schedule lists a number of drugs which have been divided into the categories of class A, B and C depending upon the perceived seriousness of a particular drug.

MDA 1971 is the legal front line in the war on what are known as illegal drugs. Hence the development of the so called “legal highs” which is an attempt to make money out of substances not listed in MDA 1971, Sch 2.

The public perception of drugs

There is a public perception in the UK that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll