header-logo header-logo

A class apart

03 December 2009 / Roger Birch
Issue: 7396 / Categories: Features , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Part one: Roger Birch examines the increasing determination for certain recreational drugs to be advertised as legal

The recreational drug market is on a continual quest for drugs that can be advertised as “legal” and consequently in recent years the term “legal highs” has been adopted. However, the use of the term “legal highs” cannot be applied to all of the so-called products. This new and developing market has attempted to provide substances which fall outside the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 (MDA 1971), Sch 2 as amended. The Schedule lists a number of drugs which have been divided into the categories of class A, B and C depending upon the perceived seriousness of a particular drug.

MDA 1971 is the legal front line in the war on what are known as illegal drugs. Hence the development of the so called “legal highs” which is an attempt to make money out of substances not listed in MDA 1971, Sch 2.

The public perception of drugs

There is a public perception in the UK that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll