header-logo header-logo

A clear run?

25 February 2016 / John McMullen
Issue: 7688 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail
001_nlj_7688_mcmullen

John McMullen tackles the latest TUPE obstacle course

It is trite law that TUPE, and the EU Acquired Rights Directive 2001/23, upon which TUPE is based, both require a change of employer for transfer protection to apply. So, for example, when a company is taken over by way of the acquisition of shares in that company, the employment contract is unaffected, the company remains the employer, and TUPE does not apply.

In another context, in Hyde Housing Association Ltd v Layton UK/EAT/0124/15/MC, the EAT had to consider a similar issue. Could there be a relevant transfer for TUPE purposes where an employee moves from an employment contract with one employer to an employment contract with several employers, including the original employer?

In this case, the claimant was employed by Martlet Homes Limited as a decorator. Martlet is a registered provider of social housing in the South East. On 28 December 2007 the claimant was told that Martlet would join the Hyde Group, becoming a subsidiary of Hyde Housing Association Ltd (HHA). This would

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll