header-logo header-logo

Client funding alternatives

09 September 2010
Issue: 7432 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Third party funding on the rise among top 200 firms

Litigation funders have been used by half of the top 200 law firms, according to new research.

In the first of an annual litigation survey by Harbour Litigation Funding Ltd, 90% of firms said they “always” or “sometimes” discuss litigation funding options with their clients.

Harbour’s head of litigation funding, Susan Dunn, says: “We are increasingly seeing interest from claimants who can well afford the costs of litigation but want to share that risk and appreciate having us alongside them through the litigation.”

The survey, conducted over the summer, found three-quarters of claims are for £3m or less, while eight per cent have a value of more than £10m.
One in 10 cases incur legal costs in excess of £500,000— including experts’ fees, counsel and adverse costs, while 72% incur costs lower than £250,000.

Some firms reported that litigation time periods have increased over the last year. A third of firms said it now takes longer for High Court matters, and nearly 90% said the same for arbitrations and three-quarters said the same for tribunal cases.

However, 70% of matters relate to disputes that are less than two years old, and firms say they expect more than 80% of claims to get to trial in the High Court within two years of commencement. More than a quarter of claims are expected to reach trial within one year of commencement.

An arbitration hearing is held within two years in 90% of cases, and before the year is out in 44% of cases. Tribunal hearings are held within two years in 92% of cases, and within one year in 69% of cases.

Commercial contract disputes form the bulk of the litigation workload for the firms (44%) while professional negligence claims account for 12% and insolvency related claims make up nine per cent of litigation work. Fraud claims account for seven per cent, IP claims make up six per cent and breach of trust accounts for four per cent of litigation.

Issue: 7432 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll