header-logo header-logo

Climate action as eyes turn to COP26

03 November 2021
Issue: 7955 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Climate change litigation
printer mail-detail
Lawyers have stepped up their action on climate change, as global attention focuses on COP26

Pinsent Masons partner Michael Watson, who advises companies on climate action, said the climate emergency ‘represents the greatest risk to society and to business that we have seen in our generation’.

He said lawyers could play an important role: ‘It is likely that climate change risks are going to emerge more quickly than one could have anticipated rather than more slowly, and lawyers are good at identifying and analysing risks.’

Law firms ran COP26 information hubs, hosted talks and signed pledges as the 26th Conference of Parties (COP) got under way in Glasgow.

The biggest announcement to emerge has been a pledge by more than 100 leaders to commit to halting and reversing forest loss by 2030. An update from Travers Smith explained the commitment would be supported by £8.75bn from 12 countries while more than 30 international companies including Aviva, Schroders and Axa have committed to end investment in activities linked to deforestation.

The Forum of Insurance Lawyers (FOIL) has created a Climate Change Charter, signed by all 42 of its law firm members. It commits signatories to supporting the insurance industry as it transitions to sustainable practices and net zero carbon emissions.

The Law Society launched a climate change resolution as well as co-hosting a conference on climate change and the law with the Law Societies of Scotland and Northern Ireland, and co-hosting a webinar at the conference with Lawyers for Net-Zero.

Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said: ‘Solicitors and law firms need to prepare for how the consequences of the climate crisis will affect them and contribute to the global drive to transition to net-zero.

‘This includes identifying climate change related risks and greener courses of action, as well as reducing the greenhouse gases associated with running any business. Nearly a third of the UK’s largest businesses and many law firms have now pledged to eliminate their contribution to carbon emissions by 2050.’

 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll