header-logo header-logo

Climate change litigation: Taking the temperature

30 September 2020 / John McElroy , Luke Grimes
Issue: 7904 / Categories: Features , Climate change litigation
printer mail-detail
28459
John McElroy & Luke Grimes examine climate change litigation in England and Wales

In brief

  • The legal and regulatory framework.
  • Litigation: holding governments to account.
  • Litigation risks for businesses.

The climate crisis has dominated news headlines around the world over recent years as the true scale of the challenge to address our climate breakdown becomes increasingly clear. A key part of action to address the crisis must be the introduction and enforcement of a legal framework which facilitates significant change. Here, we consider the existing legal framework in England and Wales, particularly focusing on directors’ duties, and the role of recent and potential future developments in climate change litigation for the wider debate.

The legal & regulatory framework

As regards directors’ duties relating to climate change, several provisions under the Companies Act 2006 offer ways for investors to monitor and take necessary action. Under s 393, directors must not approve accounts unless they are satisfied that they ‘give a fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll