header-logo header-logo

Climate change litigation: Taking the temperature

30 September 2020 / John McElroy , Luke Grimes
Issue: 7904 / Categories: Features , Climate change litigation
printer mail-detail
28459
John McElroy & Luke Grimes examine climate change litigation in England and Wales

In brief

  • The legal and regulatory framework.
  • Litigation: holding governments to account.
  • Litigation risks for businesses.

The climate crisis has dominated news headlines around the world over recent years as the true scale of the challenge to address our climate breakdown becomes increasingly clear. A key part of action to address the crisis must be the introduction and enforcement of a legal framework which facilitates significant change. Here, we consider the existing legal framework in England and Wales, particularly focusing on directors’ duties, and the role of recent and potential future developments in climate change litigation for the wider debate.

The legal & regulatory framework

As regards directors’ duties relating to climate change, several provisions under the Companies Act 2006 offer ways for investors to monitor and take necessary action. Under s 393, directors must not approve accounts unless they are satisfied that they ‘give a fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll