header-logo header-logo

30 September 2020 / John McElroy , Luke Grimes
Issue: 7904 / Categories: Features , Climate change litigation
printer mail-detail

Climate change litigation: Taking the temperature

28459
John McElroy & Luke Grimes examine climate change litigation in England and Wales

In brief

  • The legal and regulatory framework.
  • Litigation: holding governments to account.
  • Litigation risks for businesses.

The climate crisis has dominated news headlines around the world over recent years as the true scale of the challenge to address our climate breakdown becomes increasingly clear. A key part of action to address the crisis must be the introduction and enforcement of a legal framework which facilitates significant change. Here, we consider the existing legal framework in England and Wales, particularly focusing on directors’ duties, and the role of recent and potential future developments in climate change litigation for the wider debate.

The legal & regulatory framework

As regards directors’ duties relating to climate change, several provisions under the Companies Act 2006 offer ways for investors to monitor and take necessary action. Under s 393, directors must not approve accounts unless they are satisfied that they ‘give a fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll