header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
30 September 2020 / John McElroy , Luke Grimes
Issue: 7904 / Categories: Features , Climate change litigation
printer mail-detail

Climate change litigation: Taking the temperature

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
28459
John McElroy & Luke Grimes examine climate change litigation in England and Wales

In brief

  • The legal and regulatory framework.
  • Litigation: holding governments to account.
  • Litigation risks for businesses.

The climate crisis has dominated news headlines around the world over recent years as the true scale of the challenge to address our climate breakdown becomes increasingly clear. A key part of action to address the crisis must be the introduction and enforcement of a legal framework which facilitates significant change. Here, we consider the existing legal framework in England and Wales, particularly focusing on directors’ duties, and the role of recent and potential future developments in climate change litigation for the wider debate.

The legal & regulatory framework

As regards directors’ duties relating to climate change, several provisions under the Companies Act 2006 offer ways for investors to monitor and take necessary action. Under s 393, directors must not approve accounts unless they are satisfied that they ‘give a fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll