header-logo header-logo

26 April 2023
Issue: 8022 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Environment , ESG
printer mail-detail

Climate guidance for solicitors issued

Law firms should be alert to ‘greenwashing’ risks, and should not describe themselves as ‘sustainable’ unless partners are confident this claim can stand up to external scrutiny.

When presented with a new instruction, solicitors should consider whether climate legal risks may be material to their advice. And reasonably competent solicitors should be aware of the impact and relevance of climate change to their practice area and be able to advise clients accordingly.

Solicitors can choose to decline work that conflicts with their values on climate change.

Moreover, in order to obtain professional indemnity insurance in future, law firms may be asked to demonstrate how they are equipping themselves to advise on climate legal risks and to identify when they are not competent to advise.

The above is included in the Law Society’s ‘Guidance on the impact of climate change on solicitors’, issued last week.

The guidance is in two parts. Part A covers how organisations should manage their business in a manner consistent with the transition to net zero. Part B provides guidance on how climate change physical risks and climate legal risks may be relevant to client advice.

Caroline May, chair of the Law Society’s climate change working group, said the group believed the guidance was the first of its kind for the solicitors’ profession anywhere in the world.

Lisa McClory, a solicitor specialising in technology and sustainability and director at Fractal Legal, said: ‘The list of areas where solicitors should advise their clients is quite extensive, and all practitioners will have to take this seriously in order to stay up to date with climate science.

‘It would be helpful to see some formal guidance from regulators on the extent of solicitors' professional duties to advise clients of climate-related risks, and also some further recognition of equally important risks from biodiversity and nature loss.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

back-to-top-scroll