header-logo header-logo

Climate guidance for solicitors issued

26 April 2023
Issue: 8022 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Environment , ESG
printer mail-detail
Law firms should be alert to ‘greenwashing’ risks, and should not describe themselves as ‘sustainable’ unless partners are confident this claim can stand up to external scrutiny.

When presented with a new instruction, solicitors should consider whether climate legal risks may be material to their advice. And reasonably competent solicitors should be aware of the impact and relevance of climate change to their practice area and be able to advise clients accordingly.

Solicitors can choose to decline work that conflicts with their values on climate change.

Moreover, in order to obtain professional indemnity insurance in future, law firms may be asked to demonstrate how they are equipping themselves to advise on climate legal risks and to identify when they are not competent to advise.

The above is included in the Law Society’s ‘Guidance on the impact of climate change on solicitors’, issued last week.

The guidance is in two parts. Part A covers how organisations should manage their business in a manner consistent with the transition to net zero. Part B provides guidance on how climate change physical risks and climate legal risks may be relevant to client advice.

Caroline May, chair of the Law Society’s climate change working group, said the group believed the guidance was the first of its kind for the solicitors’ profession anywhere in the world.

Lisa McClory, a solicitor specialising in technology and sustainability and director at Fractal Legal, said: ‘The list of areas where solicitors should advise their clients is quite extensive, and all practitioners will have to take this seriously in order to stay up to date with climate science.

‘It would be helpful to see some formal guidance from regulators on the extent of solicitors' professional duties to advise clients of climate-related risks, and also some further recognition of equally important risks from biodiversity and nature loss.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll