header-logo header-logo

The climate crisis & the cab rank rule

117949
Has the recent debate on refusal to act for fossil fuel companies exposed anomalies in the cab rank rule? Geoffrey Bindman KC considers the position for solicitors & barristers

The cab rank rule for barristers is said to date from the trial of Charles I in 1649, when John Cooke, the solicitor general, led the prosecution in Westminster Hall. He did not deliver his opening speech because Charles refused to recognise the court, but Charles was nonetheless convicted and executed. On the restoration of the monarchy in 1660, when the regicides were tried in their turn, Cooke met the same fate. His defence—that he was compelled to prosecute as a professional duty—was rejected. Ever since, the supposed duty of barristers to act for all who seek their services, on which Cooke vainly relied, has been acknowledged but rarely enforced.

Basic rules

The Daily Mail on 23 March 2023 misrepresented the cab rank rule in order to attack the barristers and solicitors who call themselves

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

North West residential development team welcomes partner and associate

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll