header-logo header-logo

Cloak & dagger in the Court of Protection? (Pt 2)

20 January 2023 / Laura Davidson
Issue: 8009 / Categories: Features , Court of Protection , Mental health
printer mail-detail
107045
Is it time for the shadowy practice of covert medication to be brought into the light? Dr Laura Davidson thinks so
  • The hearing following disclosure of the surreptitious medication duplicity in Re A (Covert Medication: Closed Proceedings).
  • The decision’s lawfulness in excluding from the hearings the mother of the young woman at the centre of the case.
  • The practice of covert medication and the lack of legal safeguards surrounding its use.

I recently provided a detailed history of Re A (Covert Medication: Closed Proceedings) [2022] EWCOP 44 (See Pt 1, 172 NLJ 8005, pp9-10). Here, I cover the hearing following disclosure of the surreptitious medication duplicity, reflect on the decision’s lawfulness in excluding B, the mother of the young woman at the centre of this case, from hearings, and discuss the practice of covert medication itself.

Background

Initially, a brief outline is provided for those coming to the case anew.

A, who had mild learning disability and Asperger’s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
back-to-top-scroll