header-logo header-logo

22 June 2017
Issue: 7751 / Categories: Bar Council , Legal News , Brexit , EU
printer mail-detail

Clock ticking on passporting rights

Critical for financial institutions that Brexit agenda covers passporting as soon as possible

It is vital to discuss passporting rights or transitional arrangements ‘as soon as possible’, a leading financial institutions lawyer warned this week as the Brexit negotiations got underway.

Rachel Kent, global head of financial institutions practice, Hogan Lovells, said the key concern for financial institutions is passporting, which allows firms authorised in the UK to operate in the European Economic Area, and vice versa. Passporting rights end once the UK leaves the EU. Therefore, financial institutions would need to have relocated parts of their business to the EU, with appropriate licensing, in order to continue trading.

Financial institutions are currently in the advanced stages of preparing their contingency plans, she said. The Bank of England has given firms until 14 July to submit these to the regulator, the Prudential Regulation Authority.

Kent warned that, given the level of preparation and expense required to move operations overseas, time may be running out. She said firms are reluctant to relocate, and equally unlikely to move back once they have moved.

‘It is critical for the industry that either a mutual access deal is agreed or transitional arrangements maintaining the status quo are put in place to take the pressure off for a further two or three years,’ she said.

‘We wait with bated breath for when this will make it on to the agenda. It needs to be done as soon as possible.

‘We are hoping for a bespoke mutual access deal, probably in the form of a free trade agreement, whereby all or some of the current passporting rights can be created. That would cause minimal disruption, and firms wouldn’t need to relocate.’

Meanwhile, Guy Lougher, head of Brexit advisory at Pinsent Masons, has warned the chances of agreeing a transitional arrangement on trade, let alone finalising and adopting a full new trade deal, ‘look slim’ as to do so would require the unanimous approval of all 27 EU countries.

He said companies are calculating the last date by when they must have taken any decision to move or adapt their business, and ‘realising they need to take a decision soon’.

Issue: 7751 / Categories: Bar Council , Legal News , Brexit , EU
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll