header-logo header-logo

CO: the hidden dangers

22 January 2020 / Stephanie Trotter
Issue: 7871 / Categories: Features , Health & safety
printer mail-detail
14463
Carbon monoxide leakage poses serious, even lethal, risks yet there are many obstacles to bringing a legal claim, Stephanie Trotter warns
  • Outlines the obstacles to bringing a claim: proving CO poisoning can be difficult.
  • CO kills yet basic Health and Safety Commission recommendations have not been implemented.
  • About three million people, or even more in the UK could be being exposed to carbon monoxide now.

In poisoning cases, evidence of poisoning, causation and expert medical evidence are usually extremely difficult. The gas cannot be smelled, tasted, seen or touched but less than 2% of CO in the air can kill in one to three minutes. Exposure, often from faulty heating and cooking appliances, can also cause brain damage or make people very ill.

Firemen when talking about CO in smoke (which you can smell) say it takes only three breaths, the first you don’t know there’s a problem, the second you might suspect there’s something wrong but by the third you are incapable of action. Landlords are usually worth suing.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll