header-logo header-logo

The cohabitation conundrum

24 October 2013 / Geraldine Morris
Issue: 7581 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Geraldine Morris tracks recent attempts to clarify cohabitation

The lacuna in the law relating to cohabitants has been highlighted again by the Cohabitation Rights Bill which received its first reading in the House of Lords earlier this month. It isn’t the first time a Bill has sought to address the myriad of non-family law that applies to cohabitants, and it remains to be seen whether it will succeed, but one area the Bill highlights is how cohabitation may be defined. This article will consider:
  • the wide-ranging definitions of cohabitation in the current law;
  • the courts’ approach to pre-marriage cohabitation;
  • the impact of post-separation/divorce cohabitation on spouses or civil partners in relation to financial provision, in particular periodical payments; and
  • how that approach might change if a cohabitation Bill were to finally succeed.

Definitions

The Cohabitation Rights Bill defines cohabitation as two people (A and B) in a relationship, who are not married or civil partners of each other, or within prohibited degrees of relationship, and who:

  • live together as a couple; and
  • to whom
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll