header-logo header-logo

A collaborative approach

17 April 2014 / Clive Freedman KC
Issue: 7603 / Categories: barrister , Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Clive Freedman QC explains how teamwork underpins the foundations of a successful cross-examination

Lawyer, legislator and US Attorney General Benjamin Butler was regarded as one of the most skilled cross-examiners of his day. A particular case, turning on the capabilities of iron, led him to spend a week quite literally at the grindstone working in a railway repair workshop. When it comes to cross-examination, the metaphor of thinking outside the box assumes an altogether new meaning.

The popular portrayal of a witness crumbling and confessing tearfully all under the scrutiny of the barrister’s wit and masterful advocacy is, unfortunately, the stuff of fiction. Witnesses can be backed into a corner, but presentation in court is only part of the story. It is a common misconception that cross-examination is exclusively the barrister’s domain. It is important not to overlook the crucial ways in which solicitor and client can help prepare. Barrister, solicitor and client are members of a team bringing to it valuable and different perspectives.

Solicitors possess an unrivalled knowledge of the case.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll