header-logo header-logo

17 April 2014 / Clive Freedman KC
Issue: 7603 / Categories: barrister , Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

A collaborative approach

Clive Freedman QC explains how teamwork underpins the foundations of a successful cross-examination

Lawyer, legislator and US Attorney General Benjamin Butler was regarded as one of the most skilled cross-examiners of his day. A particular case, turning on the capabilities of iron, led him to spend a week quite literally at the grindstone working in a railway repair workshop. When it comes to cross-examination, the metaphor of thinking outside the box assumes an altogether new meaning.

The popular portrayal of a witness crumbling and confessing tearfully all under the scrutiny of the barrister’s wit and masterful advocacy is, unfortunately, the stuff of fiction. Witnesses can be backed into a corner, but presentation in court is only part of the story. It is a common misconception that cross-examination is exclusively the barrister’s domain. It is important not to overlook the crucial ways in which solicitor and client can help prepare. Barrister, solicitor and client are members of a team bringing to it valuable and different perspectives.

Solicitors possess an unrivalled knowledge of the case.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll