header-logo header-logo

03 July 2009 / Alan Owens
Issue: 7376 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Commercial
printer mail-detail

A collective debate

Alan Owens predicts a long wait if the UK is to adopt a class action regime

There has in recent years been much debate about the development of collective action mechanisms both at national and European levels. In the case of Emerald Supplies Ltd v British Airways Plc [2009] EWHC 741 (Ch) the chancellor of the High Court struck out the representative element of a claimant’s claim concerning alleged anti-competitive agreements which have been the subject of prosecutions in the US and on-going investigations by the European Commission. The decision highlights the status of the current collective mechanisms in the UK.

The claim

The claimants imported cut flowers from Columbia and Kenya and used the air freight services of British Airways (BA) and other international airlines. The claimants alleged that BA had been a party to agreements and concerted practices with other international airlines directly or indirectly to fix the prices at which air freight services are supplied or to control or share the market for that supply with the object or effect

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll