header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
16 October 2014 / Monika Sobiecki , Spencer Keen
Issue: 7626 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Come in number 15!

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
keen

Section 15 of the Equality Act is starting to flex its muscles, say Spencer Keen & Monika Sobiecki

Initially introduced by the Equality Act to fix the lacuna left by Malcolm v Lewisham Borough Council [2008] IRLR 700, [2008] 4 All ER 525, s 15 of the Equality Act 2010 has enjoyed little judicial scrutiny. Now that the broad test for when a person is treated unfavourably because of something arising in consequence of disability has been reinstated by the Equality Act, s 15 is likely to assume a position, as its predecessor once did, as one of the most important protections that disabled persons enjoy.

The recent decision of the Employment Appeal Tribunal in Hensman v Ministry of Defence UKEAT/0067/14/DM provides helpful guidance on the correct approach to this cause of action. Of particular interest to practitioners will be the tribunal and Employment Appeal Tribunal’s (EAT) acceptance that a dismissal because of criminal conduct, could nevertheless be a dismissal “arising in consequence” of disability (a connection that would not have

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll