header-logo header-logo

Coming of age?

16 December 2010 / Daniel Lightman KC
Issue: 7446 / Categories: Features , Costs , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Daniel Lightman revisits the statutory derivative claim…three years on

The statutory derivative claim recently celebrated its third birthday. It was created by Part 11 of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006), which came into force on 1 October 2007.

This article first considers the approach which the courts have taken to the statutory derivative claim in its first three years, and then identifies two potentially significant issues as to the ambit of derivative claims which are currently unclear and await resolution by the courts, namely whether the common law derivative claim has been abolished and whether such claims can be brought in respect of a company in liquidation.

The two-stage application for permission

Because he is seeking to bring a claim not on his own behalf but on behalf of and for the benefit of the company of which he is a member, after issuing the claim form the derivative claimant must apply for permission to continue the claim. CA 2006 provides for

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll