header-logo header-logo

16 September 2009
Categories: Legal News , Company , Competition , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Commercial battleground tests sporting prowess

The investigation by the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) into allegations of price fixing between two of the UK’s major sports retailers could have serious implications for the commercial market.

The investigation follows a referral from the Office of Fair Trading (OFT). The OFT acted following an approached in January this year by retailer JJB. The company contacted the OFT with a view to immunity for material relating to “a suspected agreement or concerted practice to dampen competition in the sports retail market in the period from 8 June 2007 to 25 March 2009”. That period relates to that served by JJB’s former chief executive Christopher Ronnie who was fired after alleged gross misconduct.
           
In 2003, the OFT imposed a record fine of £19m on a number of sports retailers, including JJB, after the controller of Sports Direct, Mike Ashley, turned whistleblower. That investigation related to fixing the price of replica England and Manchester United shirts. The current investigation by the SFO is thought to centre on fixing the prices of tennis and squash balls.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll