header-logo header-logo

08 February 2007
Issue: 7259 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Banking , Competition
printer mail-detail

Commission condemns banking competition barriers

News

Major competition barriers in the EU’s retail banking sector have been uncovered by the European Commission which now plans to use its competition enforcement powers and launch separate investigations into particular cases.

The Commission found widespread barriers deterring new players from entering the market, and markets remain fragmented along national lines.
Sam Szlezinger, a partner at Denton Wilde Sapte, says that in some member states, sustained high profitability, high market concentration and entry barriers mean that banks may be able to exploit consumers and small firms.
“The Commission is concerned about card payment systems; credit registers; co-operation between banks; and setting of prices and policies,” he adds.

Areas in which enforcement action is being considered include payment card fees—merchant fees and interchange fees vary widely across the EU, indicating low levels of competition; some aspects of co-operation between banks; and product tying, which may infringe competition law if practised by banks holding a dominant position.

Discriminatory rules in payment cards and payments systems markets will also be targeted as will the use of some credit registers which may be used to exclude new entrants to retail banking markets.
Tom Morrison, an associate at Rollits Solicitors, says the Office of Fair Trading has been keeping tabs on the UK banking and consumer credit sectors for some time. 

“From cross-border enforcement of claims under s 75 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974, to excessive banking charges on consumers’ credit card, current and mortgage accounts, the message has been clear: banks need to do more to protect consumers and justify what some see as exaggerated levels of profit.” 

He adds that while the Commission comments on issues such as disproportionately high banking charges for consumers, it focuses more on the inconsistencies in the markets across the member states. 

“One thing is clear,” he adds. “The banks are not in for an easy ride.”

Issue: 7259 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Banking , Competition
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll