header-logo header-logo

Commission condemns banking competition barriers

08 February 2007
Issue: 7259 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Banking , Competition
printer mail-detail

News

Major competition barriers in the EU’s retail banking sector have been uncovered by the European Commission which now plans to use its competition enforcement powers and launch separate investigations into particular cases.

The Commission found widespread barriers deterring new players from entering the market, and markets remain fragmented along national lines.
Sam Szlezinger, a partner at Denton Wilde Sapte, says that in some member states, sustained high profitability, high market concentration and entry barriers mean that banks may be able to exploit consumers and small firms.
“The Commission is concerned about card payment systems; credit registers; co-operation between banks; and setting of prices and policies,” he adds.

Areas in which enforcement action is being considered include payment card fees—merchant fees and interchange fees vary widely across the EU, indicating low levels of competition; some aspects of co-operation between banks; and product tying, which may infringe competition law if practised by banks holding a dominant position.

Discriminatory rules in payment cards and payments systems markets will also be targeted as will the use of some credit registers which may be used to exclude new entrants to retail banking markets.
Tom Morrison, an associate at Rollits Solicitors, says the Office of Fair Trading has been keeping tabs on the UK banking and consumer credit sectors for some time. 

“From cross-border enforcement of claims under s 75 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974, to excessive banking charges on consumers’ credit card, current and mortgage accounts, the message has been clear: banks need to do more to protect consumers and justify what some see as exaggerated levels of profit.” 

He adds that while the Commission comments on issues such as disproportionately high banking charges for consumers, it focuses more on the inconsistencies in the markets across the member states. 

“One thing is clear,” he adds. “The banks are not in for an easy ride.”

Issue: 7259 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Banking , Competition
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
David Lammy, Ellie Reeves and Baroness Levitt have taken up office at the Ministry of Justice, following the cabinet reshuffle
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
back-to-top-scroll