header-logo header-logo

Commission condemns banking competition barriers

08 February 2007
Issue: 7259 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Banking , Competition
printer mail-detail

News

Major competition barriers in the EU’s retail banking sector have been uncovered by the European Commission which now plans to use its competition enforcement powers and launch separate investigations into particular cases.

The Commission found widespread barriers deterring new players from entering the market, and markets remain fragmented along national lines.
Sam Szlezinger, a partner at Denton Wilde Sapte, says that in some member states, sustained high profitability, high market concentration and entry barriers mean that banks may be able to exploit consumers and small firms.
“The Commission is concerned about card payment systems; credit registers; co-operation between banks; and setting of prices and policies,” he adds.

Areas in which enforcement action is being considered include payment card fees—merchant fees and interchange fees vary widely across the EU, indicating low levels of competition; some aspects of co-operation between banks; and product tying, which may infringe competition law if practised by banks holding a dominant position.

Discriminatory rules in payment cards and payments systems markets will also be targeted as will the use of some credit registers which may be used to exclude new entrants to retail banking markets.
Tom Morrison, an associate at Rollits Solicitors, says the Office of Fair Trading has been keeping tabs on the UK banking and consumer credit sectors for some time. 

“From cross-border enforcement of claims under s 75 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974, to excessive banking charges on consumers’ credit card, current and mortgage accounts, the message has been clear: banks need to do more to protect consumers and justify what some see as exaggerated levels of profit.” 

He adds that while the Commission comments on issues such as disproportionately high banking charges for consumers, it focuses more on the inconsistencies in the markets across the member states. 

“One thing is clear,” he adds. “The banks are not in for an easy ride.”

Issue: 7259 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Banking , Competition
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Paul Madden

Gilson Gray—Paul Madden

Partner appointed to head international insolvency and dispute resolution for England

Brachers—Gill Turner Tucker

Brachers—Gill Turner Tucker

Kent firm expands regional footprint through strategic acquisition

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—William Charles

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—William Charles

Financial disputes and investigations specialist joins as partner in London

NEWS
Ministers’ proposals to raise funds by seizing interest on lawyers’ client account schemes could ‘cause firms to close’, solicitors have warned
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
back-to-top-scroll