header-logo header-logo

23 April 2009
Issue: 7366 / Categories: Legal News , Data protection , Freedom of Information
printer mail-detail

Commission takes on UK privacy laws in Phorm action

UK authorities urged to change national laws after privacy infringement

The European Commission has launched an infringement proceeding against the UK after complaints by internet users against online advertising company Phorm.

The Commission alleges the UK failed to comply with EU e-privacy and personal data protection rules by allowing Phorm to track internet users’ web-surfing patterns to determine their interests and then deliver targeted advertising, without customers’ consent.

BT allowed Phorm to trial its services in 2006 and 2007, without informing customers.

EU telecoms commissioner Viviane Reding called on the UK authorities to “change their national laws and ensure that national authorities are duly empowered and have proper sanctions at their disposal”.

It is an offence to unlawfully intercept communications, but only where interception is “intentional”, and not if the interceptor has “reasonable grounds for believing” that consent to interception has been given.

Sarah Needham, solicitor at Macfarlanes LLP, says: “It is unclear whether the Phorm service contravenes EU or UK privacy laws.

“This is because they all revolve around a ‘consent’ regime without further detailing what is meant by this and whether this would include a clearly worded opt out regime,” she says.

One possibility, Needham says, is that the Phorm service may be “legitimised” if the user has consented to use of their data in this way, although EU and UK data protection laws are unclear on what this requires.

“The law is entirely clear that internet users must be told at the time their data is collected by ISPs what it will be used for.

“It seems that Phorm is planning on including this information as part of its launch. The best way for consumers to avoid unwanted Phorm activity is therefore to read privacy policies carefully,” she adds.

The Incorporated Society of British Advertisers wants the Commission to withdraw its legal challenge, saying selfregulation is the best way to address the issue.

The UK now has two months to reply. The Commission can then issue a reasoned opinion and, if still dissatisfied, refer the case to the European Court of Justice.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll