header-logo header-logo

14 December 2018 / Michael L Nash
Issue: 7821 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Commoners & kings

​Michael Nash explores how far the customs & conventions of the Royal Family have evolved

Two weddings and two royal biographies* this year seem to have lifted the Royal Family into yet another circle of democratisation, a movement which began in the last third of the nineteenth century. But the question remains: does the public want the Royal Family to be like the rest of us? Surely their whole raison d’etre is to be different, to be other, to be ‘on another planet’?

In modern times the question has not gone beyond marriages to the aristocracy, something begun by Queen Victoria in 1871 and confirmed by George V in his various Letters Patent in 1917. The marriage of Princess Louise to the Marquess of Lorne in 1871 was the first non-royal marriage since Stuart times, if one excludes various mésalliances of the Hanoverian princes. It was popular though, simply because the princess was not marrying yet another German. The princess was given away by her own mother, the queen, her father being dead. Queen Victoria was

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll