header-logo header-logo

Commons faces Brexit marathon

07 June 2018
Issue: 7796 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Uphill struggle for May in pushing through EU Withdrawal Bill

MPs are preparing for a marathon session in the House of Commons next week as prime minister Theresa May attempts to overturn all 15 Lords defeats on the Brexit Bill in one single day.

May will try to push the EU (Withdrawal) Bill through the Commons in a 12-hour sitting on Tuesday, despite the Bill taking 20 days to pass through the House of Lords where 15 amendments were made on key areas. Peers voted for Britain to stay in the single market with freedom of movement of people, for the prime minister to report on her effort to secure a customs union, and for a ‘meaningful vote’ on the Brexit deal.

One MP said privately last week that he thought the PM may be deliberately engineering a showdown with her Brexiteer backbenchers to show them that, even if they get rid of her, they still don’t have the numbers in Parliament for their preferred ‘hard’ version of Brexit.

David Greene, senior partner at Edwin Coe and NLJ columnist, said: ‘The Lords has considered at length and in Committee and on the floor of the House many of the issues that arise from the Withdrawal Bill.

‘It would be disappointing if the Withdrawal Bill is treated simply as a political football by the Commons in the battle between party factions on both sides of the House. The Supreme Court handed power to Parliament in the Article 50 judgment. It did so because the membership of the European Union bestows rights on citizens. It is with those rights that the House of Commons toys.

‘One amendment from the Lords, for instance, relates to the retention of the Charter of Fundamental Rights after Brexit. This is a vital constitutional document providing individual rights that are not otherwise guaranteed. Its retention is all important and deserves proper consideration by the House.’

Issue: 7796 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Firm grows real estate team with tenth partner hire this financial year

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

NEWS
Early determination is no longer a novelty in arbitration. In NLJ this week, Gustavo Moser, arbitration specialist lawyer at Lexis+, charts the global embrace of summary disposal powers, now embedded in the Arbitration Act 1996 and mirrored worldwide. Tribunals may swiftly dismiss claims with ‘no real prospect of succeeding’, but only if fairness is preserved
The Ministry of Justice is once again in the dock as access to justice continues to deteriorate. NLJ consultant editor David Greene warns in this week's issue that neither public legal aid nor private litigation funding looks set for a revival in 2026
Civil justice lurches onward with characteristic eccentricity. In his latest Civil Way column, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist, surveys a procedural landscape featuring 19-page bundle rules, digital possession claims, and rent laws he labels ‘bonkers’
Can a chief constable be held responsible for disobedient officers? Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth, professor of public law at De Montfort University, examines a Court of Appeal ruling that answers firmly: yes
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
back-to-top-scroll