header-logo header-logo

07 June 2018
Issue: 7796 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Commons faces Brexit marathon

Uphill struggle for May in pushing through EU Withdrawal Bill

MPs are preparing for a marathon session in the House of Commons next week as prime minister Theresa May attempts to overturn all 15 Lords defeats on the Brexit Bill in one single day.

May will try to push the EU (Withdrawal) Bill through the Commons in a 12-hour sitting on Tuesday, despite the Bill taking 20 days to pass through the House of Lords where 15 amendments were made on key areas. Peers voted for Britain to stay in the single market with freedom of movement of people, for the prime minister to report on her effort to secure a customs union, and for a ‘meaningful vote’ on the Brexit deal.

One MP said privately last week that he thought the PM may be deliberately engineering a showdown with her Brexiteer backbenchers to show them that, even if they get rid of her, they still don’t have the numbers in Parliament for their preferred ‘hard’ version of Brexit.

David Greene, senior partner at Edwin Coe and NLJ columnist, said: ‘The Lords has considered at length and in Committee and on the floor of the House many of the issues that arise from the Withdrawal Bill.

‘It would be disappointing if the Withdrawal Bill is treated simply as a political football by the Commons in the battle between party factions on both sides of the House. The Supreme Court handed power to Parliament in the Article 50 judgment. It did so because the membership of the European Union bestows rights on citizens. It is with those rights that the House of Commons toys.

‘One amendment from the Lords, for instance, relates to the retention of the Charter of Fundamental Rights after Brexit. This is a vital constitutional document providing individual rights that are not otherwise guaranteed. Its retention is all important and deserves proper consideration by the House.’

Issue: 7796 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll