header-logo header-logo

Companies Act 2006 raises environmental threat

04 October 2007
Issue: 7291 / Categories: Legal News , Environment , Commercial
printer mail-detail

News

UK company directors could face law suits from all over the world for causing environmental damage following this week’s implementation of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006), lawyers warn.

Paul Lester, a partner specialising in corporate law at LG, warns that the legislation opens the door for directors to be sued in British courts for damage to the environment in any part of the world.

“This is genuinely groundbreaking in that it is no longer going to be enough for directors solely to focus on the bottom line when assessing their company’s performance—they will also have to consider what impact the company’s activities might have on others and be able to demonstrate that they have fulfilled their corporate and social responsibility,” he says.
Colleen Theron, head of LG’s environmental practice, says CA 2006 will force companies to demonstrate and verify their environmental and social practices.

She says: “The impact is potentially much greater, as businesses will be forced to carry out internal risk assessments and review all their policies and procedures on the environment and social issues to avoid the risk of lawsuits.”

CA 2006 also changes the procedure for bringing derivative actions—which could make it easier for shareholders to sue directors—and introduces new rules on meetings and shareholder resolutions.

Issue: 7291 / Categories: Legal News , Environment , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll