header-logo header-logo

04 October 2007
Issue: 7291 / Categories: Legal News , Environment , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Companies Act 2006 raises environmental threat

News

UK company directors could face law suits from all over the world for causing environmental damage following this week’s implementation of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006), lawyers warn.

Paul Lester, a partner specialising in corporate law at LG, warns that the legislation opens the door for directors to be sued in British courts for damage to the environment in any part of the world.

“This is genuinely groundbreaking in that it is no longer going to be enough for directors solely to focus on the bottom line when assessing their company’s performance—they will also have to consider what impact the company’s activities might have on others and be able to demonstrate that they have fulfilled their corporate and social responsibility,” he says.
Colleen Theron, head of LG’s environmental practice, says CA 2006 will force companies to demonstrate and verify their environmental and social practices.

She says: “The impact is potentially much greater, as businesses will be forced to carry out internal risk assessments and review all their policies and procedures on the environment and social issues to avoid the risk of lawsuits.”

CA 2006 also changes the procedure for bringing derivative actions—which could make it easier for shareholders to sue directors—and introduces new rules on meetings and shareholder resolutions.

Issue: 7291 / Categories: Legal News , Environment , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll