header-logo header-logo

09 February 2012
Issue: 7500 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Company

GHLM Trading Ltd v Maroo and others [2012] EWHC 61 (Ch), [2012] All ER (D) 172 (Jan)

Once it was shown that a company director had received company money, it would be for him to show that the payment had been proper. Similarly, where debit entries had been correctly made to a director’s loan account, it would be incumbent on the director to justify credit entries on the account. While the interests of a company would normally be identified with those of its members, the interests of creditors could become relevant if a company fell into financial difficulties. Where creditors’ interests were relevant, it would be a director’s duty to have regard to the interests of the creditors as a class. If a director acted to advance the interests of a particular creditor, without believing the action to be in the interests of creditors as a class, he would commit a breach of duty.

Where a director caused his company to enter into a contract in pursuit of his own interests, and not in the interests of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll