header-logo header-logo

Company

09 February 2012
Issue: 7500 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

GHLM Trading Ltd v Maroo and others [2012] EWHC 61 (Ch), [2012] All ER (D) 172 (Jan)

Once it was shown that a company director had received company money, it would be for him to show that the payment had been proper. Similarly, where debit entries had been correctly made to a director’s loan account, it would be incumbent on the director to justify credit entries on the account. While the interests of a company would normally be identified with those of its members, the interests of creditors could become relevant if a company fell into financial difficulties. Where creditors’ interests were relevant, it would be a director’s duty to have regard to the interests of the creditors as a class. If a director acted to advance the interests of a particular creditor, without believing the action to be in the interests of creditors as a class, he would commit a breach of duty.

Where a director caused his company to enter into a contract in pursuit of his own interests, and not in the interests of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll