header-logo header-logo

18 January 2013
Issue: 7544 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Company

Tallington Lakes Ltd and another v Ancasta International Boat Sales Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 1712, [2013] All ER (D) 14 (Jan)

It was settled law that, if a company could demonstrate that the alleged debt on which a petition was founded was genuinely disputed on substantial grounds, the court would strike out the petition. The principle was essentially a statement of general practice. A petitioner had to establish its standing to present a winding-up petition. Those with standing were defined for the present purposes by s 124 of the Insolvency Act 1986 and included any creditor or creditors. Where the company disputed any liability to a person petitioning as a creditor, it was taking issue with the petitioner’s standing to present the petition. It would, in theory, be open to the court dealing with the winding-up petition to try that issue itself, as in effect a preliminary issue. However, for at least three sound reasons, that was not the practice of the court: (i) it was not the function of the Companies Court to try disputed debt claims;

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll