header-logo header-logo

18 January 2013
Issue: 7544 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Company

Tallington Lakes Ltd and another v Ancasta International Boat Sales Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 1712, [2013] All ER (D) 14 (Jan)

It was settled law that, if a company could demonstrate that the alleged debt on which a petition was founded was genuinely disputed on substantial grounds, the court would strike out the petition. The principle was essentially a statement of general practice. A petitioner had to establish its standing to present a winding-up petition. Those with standing were defined for the present purposes by s 124 of the Insolvency Act 1986 and included any creditor or creditors. Where the company disputed any liability to a person petitioning as a creditor, it was taking issue with the petitioner’s standing to present the petition. It would, in theory, be open to the court dealing with the winding-up petition to try that issue itself, as in effect a preliminary issue. However, for at least three sound reasons, that was not the practice of the court: (i) it was not the function of the Companies Court to try disputed debt claims;

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

North West residential development team welcomes partner and associate

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
A landmark ruling has delivered the first judicial application of the UK’s anti-SLAPP regime and provided fresh guidance on abusive litigation
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
Non-court dispute resolution is no longer an alternative in family law—it is rapidly becoming the norm
back-to-top-scroll