header-logo header-logo

18 March 2026
Issue: 8154 / Categories: Legal News , Public
printer mail-detail

Burials and cremation law under review

Centuries-old burial laws would be overhauled, under Law Commission proposals to address the burgeoning problem of shortage of cemetery space

Its final report on burials and cremation, published this week after public consultation in 2024–25, recommends tighter safeguards—graves could be reused once 100 years have passed, but only with government approval and following local consultation. Relatives or friends would have a year in which to object to reuse, increased from six months, and their objection would prevent reuse for a further 25 years. The legal protections would, for the first time, be extended to Commonwealth war graves and military graves governed by the Ministry of Defence.

Currently, grave reuse is permitted after 75 years in London council cemeteries, Church of England graveyards and some cemeteries with their own specific laws.

Law Commissioner Professor Lisa Webley said: ‘Our recommendations respond directly to contemporary challenges, including the shortage of burial space, the complexities created by Victorian-era legislation, and the need to recognise the diverse religious and cultural practices in modern Britain.’ According to government research in 2007, council cemeteries would be full within 30 years on average, and less than this in urban areas.

The commission recommends a set of consistent rules for private and family cemeteries, including a minimum of two feet of soil above the coffin—there is currently no law on this in many burial grounds. It also recommends updating the offence of unlawful exhumation and making the law on building on top of disused burial grounds more consistent.

Funeral directors currently hold hundreds of thousands of sets of uncollected ashes. Under the commission’s recommendations, they would be able to return uncollected ashes to the crematorium concerned. Tighter safeguards would prevent unidentified remains from being cremated, and imposing identity checks to make sure the correct body is cremated.

Issue: 8154 / Categories: Legal News , Public
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll