header-logo header-logo

Financial Ombudsman to return to its roots

The Financial Ombudsman is poised for major reform to return it to a simple, impartial dispute resolution service

The treasury confirmed this week it will bring forward legislation as soon as parliamentary time allows to reform the framework governing the ombudsman. This will address concerns it sometimes acts as a ‘quasi-regulator’, creating uncertainty for consumers and businesses.

Treasury minister Lucy Rigby said the reforms would ‘make redress clearer, more consistent and easier to navigate’.

Specifically, the reforms aim to clarify the ‘fair and reasonable’ test is satisfied where firms have met their obligations under the relevant Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) rules. They will set an absolute time limit of ten years on complaints, and introduce a referral mechanism between the Financial Ombudsman Service and the FCA, requiring the ombudsman to seek the FCA’s view where there is ambiguity about the rules or an issue may have wider implications for the financial services industry.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll