header-logo header-logo

Company law

11 October 2013
Issue: 7579 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Re Sigma-Tau Pharma Ltd and another [2013] All ER (D) 31 (Oct)

The issue for consideration was whether the court should approve the cross-border merger. Consideration was given to reg 16 of the Companies (Cross Border Mergers) Regulations 2007 (SI 2007/2974). The court ruled that it was settled law that, in assessing whether to complete a merger, the court had to examine the proposed merger and be satisfied that it did not affect any stakeholder in any of the merging companies, including shareholders, employees or creditors, in any material way, and be satisfied that there was not any other good reason why the approval should be refused. The fact that a pre-merger certificate had been issued by another country did not remove the requirement for the court to scrutinize the merger.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll