header-logo header-logo

11 October 2013
Issue: 7579 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Company law

Re Sigma-Tau Pharma Ltd and another [2013] All ER (D) 31 (Oct)

The issue for consideration was whether the court should approve the cross-border merger. Consideration was given to reg 16 of the Companies (Cross Border Mergers) Regulations 2007 (SI 2007/2974). The court ruled that it was settled law that, in assessing whether to complete a merger, the court had to examine the proposed merger and be satisfied that it did not affect any stakeholder in any of the merging companies, including shareholders, employees or creditors, in any material way, and be satisfied that there was not any other good reason why the approval should be refused. The fact that a pre-merger certificate had been issued by another country did not remove the requirement for the court to scrutinize the merger.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll