header-logo header-logo

11 October 2013
Issue: 7579 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Company law

Re Sigma-Tau Pharma Ltd and another [2013] All ER (D) 31 (Oct)

The issue for consideration was whether the court should approve the cross-border merger. Consideration was given to reg 16 of the Companies (Cross Border Mergers) Regulations 2007 (SI 2007/2974). The court ruled that it was settled law that, in assessing whether to complete a merger, the court had to examine the proposed merger and be satisfied that it did not affect any stakeholder in any of the merging companies, including shareholders, employees or creditors, in any material way, and be satisfied that there was not any other good reason why the approval should be refused. The fact that a pre-merger certificate had been issued by another country did not remove the requirement for the court to scrutinize the merger.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Shakespeare Martineau—David Vaughan

Shakespeare Martineau—David Vaughan

Shakespeare Martineau appoints new London office head as firm continues investment in capital

Browne Jacobson—Kevin Moore

Browne Jacobson—Kevin Moore

Browne Jacobson strengthens All-Island life sciences platform with appointment of leading Galway MedTech lawyer

Clarke Willmott—Latitude Law

Clarke Willmott—Latitude Law

National law firm strengthens commercial offering with acquisition of leading immigration practice

NEWS
Mr Justice Nicklin’s decision to order costs on an indemnity basis may be a ‘significant win’ but it’s still ‘far from game, set and match’ for Associated Newspapers, a former costs judge has said
The Law Society RFC Festival of Sport returns next month, bringing together legal and financial services professionals for one of the sector’s largest annual sporting events
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners
back-to-top-scroll