header-logo header-logo

23 October 2008
Issue: 7342 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Comparative matters

How much scope do advertisers have to use comparative trademarks? Ask Hamish Porter & Louisa Albertini

Comparative advertising, where goods or services offered by a competitor are identified by reference to a registered trade mark, can cause great concern to trade mark owners as their competitors normally seek to make unfavourable comparisons with their own goods or services, or to take advantage of being associated with the market leader's brand. The UK courts have recently requested guidance from the European Court of Justice (ECJ) on the extent to which comparative advertising can be used.
Marking one's territory

The Trade Marks Directive (TMD), (First Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988, to approximate the laws of the member states relating to trade marks), provides that a trade mark owner is entitled under certain conditions to prevent third parties from using a sign which is identical or similar to his trade mark, including use in advertising. In contrast, the Comparative Advertising Directive—Council Directive 84/450/ EEC of 10 September 1984 relating to the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
Can a meticulously maintained spreadsheet turn a couple’s informal financial arrangements into legally enforceable obligations? 
back-to-top-scroll