header-logo header-logo

Comparative matters

23 October 2008
Issue: 7342 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

How much scope do advertisers have to use comparative trademarks? Ask Hamish Porter & Louisa Albertini

Comparative advertising, where goods or services offered by a competitor are identified by reference to a registered trade mark, can cause great concern to trade mark owners as their competitors normally seek to make unfavourable comparisons with their own goods or services, or to take advantage of being associated with the market leader's brand. The UK courts have recently requested guidance from the European Court of Justice (ECJ) on the extent to which comparative advertising can be used.
Marking one's territory

The Trade Marks Directive (TMD), (First Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988, to approximate the laws of the member states relating to trade marks), provides that a trade mark owner is entitled under certain conditions to prevent third parties from using a sign which is identical or similar to his trade mark, including use in advertising. In contrast, the Comparative Advertising Directive—Council Directive 84/450/ EEC of 10 September 1984 relating to the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
back-to-top-scroll