header-logo header-logo

23 January 2015 / Dr Chris Pamplin
Issue: 7637 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

Compare & contrast (Pt 1)

pampline

Chris Pamplin explains why new guidance should be required reading for all expert witnesses & those who instruct them

The long-awaited update to the 2007 Protocol for the Instruction of Experts to give Evidence in Civil Claims (written by the Civil Justice Council (CJC)) is with us at last. Renamed Guidance for the instruction of experts in civil claims, it leaves much of the original guidance in place but adds some new material in areas that have changed, or been introduced, since 2007. This short series works through the new guidance drawing out the key points for experts, providing a refresher on the guidance that has not changed, and an introduction to the areas that have.

  • References in the form (para 1) represent the paragraph number in the new guidance.
  • New material is in bold.

Purpose

The purpose of the guidance is now to allow litigants, experts and those who instruct them to “… understand best practice in complying with Part 35 and court orders”. In the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll