header-logo header-logo

23 October 2014 / David Greene
Issue: 7627 / Categories: Opinion , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Compensating the consumer

speakerscorner_green

Post-Jackson could individuals wronged by Wonga secure access to the court at a reasonable cost, asks David Greene

As “class action” lawyers we are often approached by individuals on potential claims against corporations or public bodies. Someone asked me the other day about potential claims against Wonga following the FCA and company’s announcements of the writing off of a huge swathe of debt. I know not if a claim arises but if it does, how do the individuals secure access to the court at a reasonable cost?

A claim brought by a large group sharing the cost and liabilities might be seen as a reasonable way forward. Unfortunately, the post-Jackson world does not lend itself to such a collective approach leaving potential claimants without a reasonable remedy. The collective process we have is ad hoc and in a state of flux. For consumers with small absolute individual losses there is nowhere to turn unless a regulator intervenes as happened with the SWAPS mis-selling and to some extent in Wonga.

Finding a solution

We have

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll