header-logo header-logo

Compensation battles

08 April 2016 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7693 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail
istock_000003527863_web

Non-combatant victims of injuries by British soldiers must be able to seek compensation, says Geoffrey Bindman QC

The prime minister has pledged to work to end what he calls “hounding” of service personnel by claimant lawyers. Michael Gove has echoed this promise by telling us he will include suitable provisions in his projected “Bill of Rights”. Claimant lawyers are already subject to the disciplinary codes of the profession and the arraignment of two firms before the Solicitors’ Disciplinary TribunaI for alleged breaches of that code in relation to alleged ill-treatment of Iraqi citizens has prompted the prime minister’s intervention.

Importance of compensation

We must take seriously any threat to restrict the legal liability of those who cause harm to others to compensate their victims for the consequences of their acts or omissions. Redress for the injured victims of wrongdoing, whether deliberate or negligent is an honourable and important function of our legal system. Compensation provides a measure of justice for the injured. But it has been achieved only through long years of struggle. It must

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll