header-logo header-logo

08 April 2016 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7693 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Compensation battles

istock_000003527863_web

Non-combatant victims of injuries by British soldiers must be able to seek compensation, says Geoffrey Bindman QC

The prime minister has pledged to work to end what he calls “hounding” of service personnel by claimant lawyers. Michael Gove has echoed this promise by telling us he will include suitable provisions in his projected “Bill of Rights”. Claimant lawyers are already subject to the disciplinary codes of the profession and the arraignment of two firms before the Solicitors’ Disciplinary TribunaI for alleged breaches of that code in relation to alleged ill-treatment of Iraqi citizens has prompted the prime minister’s intervention.

Importance of compensation

We must take seriously any threat to restrict the legal liability of those who cause harm to others to compensate their victims for the consequences of their acts or omissions. Redress for the injured victims of wrongdoing, whether deliberate or negligent is an honourable and important function of our legal system. Compensation provides a measure of justice for the injured. But it has been achieved only through long years of struggle. It must

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll