header-logo header-logo

02 July 2021 / Stephen O'Dowd
Issue: 7939 / Categories: Features , Competition
printer mail-detail

Competing class actions—who wins carriage?

52139
Stephen O’Dowd looks at competing claims & whether parties can afford to let the courts roll the dice
  • Looks at approach to competing claims in Australia, Canada and the US.
  • Considers what approach the UK’s Competition Appeals Tribunal might take.

Competing claims are a common feature of class action regimes. When faced with overlapping class actions against the same defendant, courts will typically allow only one action to proceed. Which means they must resolve so-called carriage disputes, unless the parties to competing actions can find a satisfactory way to collaborate.

The UK’s class action regime is relatively new and its overseer, the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT), is yet to resolve a carriage dispute. The CAT has, instead, been preoccupied with certification, having so far refused to grant any action with clearance to launch.

The wait for the CAT’s first positive certification decision should now be short, following a recent decision by the Supreme Court that the CAT must lower its threshold. And, in what could be a bumper harvest

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Mark Hastings, Quillon Law

NLJ Career Profile: Mark Hastings, Quillon Law

Mark Hastings, founding partner of Quillon Law, on turning dreams into reality and pushing back on preconceptions about partnership

Kingsley Napley—Silvia Devecchi

Kingsley Napley—Silvia Devecchi

New family law partner for Italian and international clients appointed

Mishcon de Reya—Susannah Kintish

Mishcon de Reya—Susannah Kintish

Firm elects new chair of tier 1 ranked employment department

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll