header-logo header-logo

11 December 2024
Issue: 8098 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal services
printer mail-detail

Complaints handling fails to impress

The Legal Ombudsman (LeO) has called for a ‘cultural shift’ in the way lawyers handle complaints.

LeO warned that complaints data for the 12 months up to the end of March 2024, published last week, shows no improvement in lawyers’ standards of customer service and complaints handling—with areas of failure not changing over time.

In total, LeO took on 6,652 complaints from people unhappy with the service they’d received from a legal provider, and resolved 7,918 complaints. One third of these related to residential conveyancing, with the next biggest areas being personal injury and wills and probate.

Overall, LeO found legal providers’ standard of service hadn’t been good enough in 69% of the cases it investigated. In residential conveyancing, personal injury, and wills and probate, there was evidence of poor service in three-quarters of cases.

Poor communication accounted for one in four of all complaints upheld, while one sixth were about legal providers’ delay and failure to progress legal matters.

Moreover, LeO found that lawyers’ in-house complaints handling hadn’t been good enough in nearly half (46%) of the complaints it investigated.

Chief ombudsman Paul McFadden said: ‘It’s good news that we’re able to sort out half of all complaints through early resolution. If something’s gone wrong, and a lawyer has offered to put things right fairly, we can explain that to their client.

‘But the fact is many of these complaints could have been prevented or resolved without us. And where we need to investigate in more depth, our data doesn’t paint a positive picture. It’s also disappointing we’re not seeing change or improvement in the types of issues consumers are raising.

‘Lawyers should welcome feedback from clients—including, and perhaps especially, about what’s not gone well. It’s clear a cultural shift is needed in lawyers’ approach to complaints – they’re opportunities to learn and do things better.’

Issue: 8098 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal services
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll