header-logo header-logo

17 January 2014 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7590 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

A complex state of affairs

Jon Robins observes the fallout from the recent legal aid protests

It was handbags at dawn. The offending item being one Mulberry Bayswater handbag reportedly worth £1,100 and belonging to “a lady barrister”, as the Daily Mail delicately put it in its coverage of barristers protesting last week outside the Old Bailey.

The gathering was, according to the Mail , “the most privileged picket line ever”. “Some junior barristers earn as little as £13,000 a year, their leaders said” and so, the Mail sniped, “perhaps it was a mistake” to sport such a lavish accessory to a demo. All strikes have their hate-figures, reflected The Independent . “For the miners in 1984 it was Margaret Thatcher. For today’s barristers, the proposed cuts...have become the equivalent of pit closures.”

The standoff between the criminal defence profession and the government is a complex and convoluted state of affairs. It must be difficult for the public to make sense of last week’s walkout which was supported by thousands of solicitors as well as barristers.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll