header-logo header-logo

03 January 2019 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7822 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Conflicting rights: a stand-off?

​Alec Samuels reports on secrecy, privacy, confidentiality & anonymity in the courtroom

  • The general rule is that a hearing is to be in public.
  • The requirement for a hearing to be in public does not require the court to make special arrangements for accommodating members of the public.

Publicity is important, but justice even more so. In contemporary times many situations raise conflicts between the human rights of a fair and public hearing (Art 6), the right to privacy and family life (Art 8) and the right of free speech (Art 10).

The leading cases are:

  • Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417, 437–438, [1911-13] All ER Rep 1.
  • R(C) v Secretary of State for Justice [2016] UKSC 2, [2016] 1 WLR 444, paras [14]–[20] and [36], [2017] 1 All ER 513.
  • A v BBC [2014] UKSC 25, [2015] AC 588 [2014] 2 All ER 827.
  • V v T [2014] EWHC 3432 (Ch), [2014] All ER (D) 293 (Oct).
  • Eurasian Natural Resources Corporation Ltd v Dechert LLP [2016] EWCA Civ 375,
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll