header-logo header-logo

Conflicting rights: a stand-off?

03 January 2019 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7822 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

​Alec Samuels reports on secrecy, privacy, confidentiality & anonymity in the courtroom

  • The general rule is that a hearing is to be in public.
  • The requirement for a hearing to be in public does not require the court to make special arrangements for accommodating members of the public.

Publicity is important, but justice even more so. In contemporary times many situations raise conflicts between the human rights of a fair and public hearing (Art 6), the right to privacy and family life (Art 8) and the right of free speech (Art 10).

The leading cases are:

  • Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417, 437–438, [1911-13] All ER Rep 1.
  • R(C) v Secretary of State for Justice [2016] UKSC 2, [2016] 1 WLR 444, paras [14]–[20] and [36], [2017] 1 All ER 513.
  • A v BBC [2014] UKSC 25, [2015] AC 588 [2014] 2 All ER 827.
  • V v T [2014] EWHC 3432 (Ch), [2014] All ER (D) 293 (Oct).
  • Eurasian Natural Resources Corporation Ltd v Dechert LLP [2016] EWCA Civ 375,
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll