header-logo header-logo

03 March 2017 / Nicholas Bevan
Issue: 7736 / Categories: Opinion , EU , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

Conflicts of interest?

nlj_7736_bevan

The new Untraced Drivers Agreement fails to ensure full conformity with the protection required under European law, as Nicholas Bevan explains

On 13 January the Motor Insurers Bureau (MIB) published its new Untraced Drivers Agreement 2017 (UtDA 2017) as well as amendments to the Uninsured Drivers Agreement 2015 (UDA 2015). The changes came into effect this week (1 March 2017).

The MIB is a consortium that is owned and controlled by every motor insurer authorised to sell compulsory third party motor insurance in the UK. It was set up in 1945 at the insistence of the government and specifically charged with providing a safety net for victims of uninsured drivers and insolvent insurers. Over the years, the industry has enjoyed a licence to dictate the terms under which the MIB discharges this public service. This has led to the schemes becoming increasingly skewed in its interests. Properly understood, the MIB is a public body but, as an emanation both of the insurance industry and of the state, it is heavily conflicted in its compensatory

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll