header-logo header-logo

Conflicts of interest?

03 March 2017 / Nicholas Bevan
Issue: 7736 / Categories: Opinion , EU , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail
nlj_7736_bevan

The new Untraced Drivers Agreement fails to ensure full conformity with the protection required under European law, as Nicholas Bevan explains

On 13 January the Motor Insurers Bureau (MIB) published its new Untraced Drivers Agreement 2017 (UtDA 2017) as well as amendments to the Uninsured Drivers Agreement 2015 (UDA 2015). The changes came into effect this week (1 March 2017).

The MIB is a consortium that is owned and controlled by every motor insurer authorised to sell compulsory third party motor insurance in the UK. It was set up in 1945 at the insistence of the government and specifically charged with providing a safety net for victims of uninsured drivers and insolvent insurers. Over the years, the industry has enjoyed a licence to dictate the terms under which the MIB discharges this public service. This has led to the schemes becoming increasingly skewed in its interests. Properly understood, the MIB is a public body but, as an emanation both of the insurance industry and of the state, it is heavily conflicted in its

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

BCL Solicitors—Robert Lawrie

BCL Solicitors—Robert Lawrie

Commercial disputes team lead promoted to partner

Mourant—Tom Fothergill

Mourant—Tom Fothergill

Jersey finance and corporate practice welcomes new partner

Shakespeare Martineau—Solicitor apprentices

Shakespeare Martineau—Solicitor apprentices

Firm launches solicitor apprenticeship programme with inaugural cohort

NEWS
Government plans for offender ‘restriction zones’ risk creating ‘digital cages’ that blur punishment with surveillance, warns Henrietta Ronson, partner at Corker Binning, in this week's issue of NLJ
Louise Uphill, senior associate at Moore Barlow LLP, dissects the faltering rollout of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 in this week's NLJ
Judgments are ‘worthless without enforcement’, says HHJ Karen Walden-Smith, senior circuit judge and chair of the Civil Justice Council’s enforcement working group. In this week's NLJ, she breaks down the CJC’s April 2025 report, which identified systemic flaws and proposed 39 reforms, from modernising procedures to protecting vulnerable debtors
Writing in NLJ this week, Katherine Harding and Charlotte Finley of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Standish v Standish [2025] UKSC 26, the Supreme Court ruling that narrowed what counts as matrimonial property, and its potential impact upon claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
In this week's NLJ, Dr Jon Robins, editor of The Justice Gap and lecturer at Brighton University, reports on a campaign to posthumously exonerate Christine Keeler. 60 years after her perjury conviction, Keeler’s son Seymour Platt has petitioned the king to exercise the royal prerogative of mercy, arguing she was a victim of violence and moral hypocrisy, not deceit. Supported by Felicity Gerry KC, the dossier brands the conviction 'the ultimate in slut-shaming'
back-to-top-scroll