header-logo header-logo

05 August 2020 / Simon Gledhill , Gemma Noble
Issue: 7898 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Conspiracy theories

25529
Chain, wheel or umbrella? Simon Gledhill & Gemma Noble highlight the importance of identifying common design in conspiracy cases

In brief

  • What is a conspiracy?
  • The structure of a conspiracy.
  • Chain, wheel and umbrella conspiracies.
  • The appeal in Johnson.

In the 1973 Court of Appeal case of R v Greenfield [1973] 1 WLR 1151, [1973] 3 All ER 1050 the then Lord Chief Justice observed: ‘Conspiracy charges have long been regarded with suspicion by English lawyers. The reasons lie partly in history and partly on procedural difficulties. There have been times in our history, as for example under Henry VIII and at the end of the eighteenth century and the beginning of the nineteenth when prosecutions for conspiracy were used by the Crown to stifle criticism and prevent agitation for religious, social and economic changes.’

Forty-seven years later, while concerns as to the conduct of Henry VII no longer feature prominently in criticisms of conspiracy indictments; procedural difficulties remain a constant difficulty. This was highlighted again by the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll