header-logo header-logo

Conspiracy theories

05 August 2020 / Simon Gledhill , Gemma Noble
Issue: 7898 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail
25529
Chain, wheel or umbrella? Simon Gledhill & Gemma Noble highlight the importance of identifying common design in conspiracy cases

In brief

  • What is a conspiracy?
  • The structure of a conspiracy.
  • Chain, wheel and umbrella conspiracies.
  • The appeal in Johnson.

In the 1973 Court of Appeal case of R v Greenfield [1973] 1 WLR 1151, [1973] 3 All ER 1050 the then Lord Chief Justice observed: ‘Conspiracy charges have long been regarded with suspicion by English lawyers. The reasons lie partly in history and partly on procedural difficulties. There have been times in our history, as for example under Henry VIII and at the end of the eighteenth century and the beginning of the nineteenth when prosecutions for conspiracy were used by the Crown to stifle criticism and prevent agitation for religious, social and economic changes.’

Forty-seven years later, while concerns as to the conduct of Henry VII no longer feature prominently in criticisms of conspiracy indictments; procedural difficulties remain a constant difficulty. This was highlighted again by the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
back-to-top-scroll