header-logo header-logo

27 June 2014
Issue: 7612 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Constitutional law

Harb v HRH Prince Abdul Aziz Bin Fahd Abdul Aziz [2014] EWHC 1807 (Ch), [2014] All ER (D) 69 (Jun)

A sovereign who died in office did not remain the embodiment of the state once deceased. The principle that a former head of state enjoyed only immunity ratione materiae applied to a late King as it applied to any head of state who stood down from office during his lifetime. Further, there was no justification for treating the estate of a head of state who died in office in a more favourable way than the living former head of state or the estate of such a former head of state who died some time after leaving office.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys senior leadership appointments

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths strengthens London Construction and Engineering practice with two strategic senior hires

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins announces strategic hire to deepen skills base in the social business sector

NEWS
Existing defamation law can respond to AI ‘hallucinations’, but allocating responsibility will prove harder where outputs reach users without human intervention
The High Court has upheld a rare successful serious-irregularity challenge after an arbitrator relied on an implied term neither party had advanced
Thirty years after The Future of Law shook a profession still using fax machines, its central forecast looks increasingly less like prophecy and more like description
More than 100 teams from the legal and financial services sectors competed in five sports at the 51st Law Society RFC Festival of Sport earlier this month
Part-time status need only be an effective cause of less favourable treatment, rather than the sole cause, the Supreme Court has held in Augustine v Data Cars
back-to-top-scroll