header-logo header-logo

27 June 2014
Issue: 7612 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Constitutional law

Harb v HRH Prince Abdul Aziz Bin Fahd Abdul Aziz [2014] EWHC 1807 (Ch), [2014] All ER (D) 69 (Jun)

A sovereign who died in office did not remain the embodiment of the state once deceased. The principle that a former head of state enjoyed only immunity ratione materiae applied to a late King as it applied to any head of state who stood down from office during his lifetime. Further, there was no justification for treating the estate of a head of state who died in office in a more favourable way than the living former head of state or the estate of such a former head of state who died some time after leaving office.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

mfg Solicitors—Hayley Pearce & Lauren Williams

mfg Solicitors—Hayley Pearce & Lauren Williams

Law firm mfg Solicitors announces promotions at Ludlow office

Womble Bond Dickinson—Richard Sharpe

Womble Bond Dickinson—Richard Sharpe

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints partner in Leeds residential team

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners adds six to partnership in record year for partner promotions

NEWS
The legal profession's AI challenge extends far beyond fabricated case citations, according to a warning about the next phase of technological risk
Law firms should use the transition period before the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) assumes anti-money laundering (AML) supervision to strengthen governance and compliance, experts have warned
Cross-border disputes increasingly demand creative approaches to gathering evidence, with litigators needing to look beyond traditional letters of request
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified the distinction between contracts of 'indefinite' and 'perpetual' duration, with potentially significant implications for commercial drafting
The Court of Appeal was entitled to uphold the government's decision to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation, according to an analysis of the ruling
back-to-top-scroll