header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
04 April 2012 / Martin Burns
Issue: 7509 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Property
printer mail-detail

Constructing a case

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Martin Burns looks at the impact of removing immunity from property expert witnesses
Last year the Supreme Court made a decision that shook the ground beneath the feet of many people who make a living out of helping courts and tribunals to comprehend complicated, technical, things. I am of course talking about expert witnesses. 
 
The role of expert witnesses

The role of an expert witness is to help a court to understand things that are outside the realm of its knowledge and experience. The testimony of an expert does not bind a court, but simply adds technical detail to the evidential picture and helps a court to reach a fully informed decision. 

Expert witnesses are employed frequently by parties in litigation. They are also instructed to act in arbitration, adjudication and other dispute resolution methods which are routinely used in the property and construction sectors. For many years experts have provided testimony safe in the knowledge that they could not be sued for breach of duty to those who pay
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When post-breach events rewrite damages claims
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
NLJ this week: Supreme Court redraws unfair prejudice rules
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll