header-logo header-logo

23 April 2009 / Michael Regan
Issue: 7366 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Constructive criticism

Michael Regan charts the demise of construction litigation

Any construction lawyer surveying the litigation landscape over the last 30 years or so would agree that it has changed considerably during that period. A cursory examination of recent volumes of the Building Law Reports indicates the scope of the changes which have taken place, revealing a mixed bag of cases drawn together under a general “construction law” theme. There are cases that involve adjudication, arbitration, procedural issues and several decisions from other jurisdictions, but comparatively few which a construction lawyer would readily equate with the heart and soul of this area of law.

However, it would be wrong to conclude that previous years’ reported cases (or those that the editors have chosen to include) are anything other than an imprecise snapshot of the types of dispute which now arise. It is the fact that certain types of cases are no longer finding their way through to final judicial determination which is more revealing, and it is only those that involve adjudication that give a clue to the true

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll