header-logo header-logo

15 October 2010 / Gregory Hunt
Issue: 7437 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Consuming EU justice

Gregory Hunt provides a guide to resolving cross border consumer disputes

The internet has had many originally unthought-of consequences when it comes to international trade. Previously the closest most consumers got to purchasing overseas was either bringing home souvenirs of various sizes or being told by their local retailer that what they wanted was out of stock and would have to be “ordered from foreign parts”. Now, however, consumers often can and do cross international borders online, sometimes unwittingly, while shopping for their ideal purchases. The internet also creates an amazing research tool, one can now source a new Italian kitchen direct from Italy, send an e-mail or pick up the phone and cut out the need for a UK supplier.

X-border consumerism

In the days before virtual shopping baskets the scale of purchasing from overseas was not felt by the EU to warrant particular action. However, a recent (2009) European Commission report, Cross-Border Consumer E-Commerce, found the market was “estimated to be worth 106 billion euros in 2006”. The report also stated that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll