header-logo header-logo

Consuming EU justice

15 October 2010 / Gregory Hunt
Issue: 7437 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Gregory Hunt provides a guide to resolving cross border consumer disputes

The internet has had many originally unthought-of consequences when it comes to international trade. Previously the closest most consumers got to purchasing overseas was either bringing home souvenirs of various sizes or being told by their local retailer that what they wanted was out of stock and would have to be “ordered from foreign parts”. Now, however, consumers often can and do cross international borders online, sometimes unwittingly, while shopping for their ideal purchases. The internet also creates an amazing research tool, one can now source a new Italian kitchen direct from Italy, send an e-mail or pick up the phone and cut out the need for a UK supplier.

X-border consumerism

In the days before virtual shopping baskets the scale of purchasing from overseas was not felt by the EU to warrant particular action. However, a recent (2009) European Commission report, Cross-Border Consumer E-Commerce, found the market was “estimated to be worth 106 billion euros in 2006”. The report also stated that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll