header-logo header-logo

15 October 2010 / Gregory Hunt
Issue: 7437 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Consuming EU justice

Gregory Hunt provides a guide to resolving cross border consumer disputes

The internet has had many originally unthought-of consequences when it comes to international trade. Previously the closest most consumers got to purchasing overseas was either bringing home souvenirs of various sizes or being told by their local retailer that what they wanted was out of stock and would have to be “ordered from foreign parts”. Now, however, consumers often can and do cross international borders online, sometimes unwittingly, while shopping for their ideal purchases. The internet also creates an amazing research tool, one can now source a new Italian kitchen direct from Italy, send an e-mail or pick up the phone and cut out the need for a UK supplier.

X-border consumerism

In the days before virtual shopping baskets the scale of purchasing from overseas was not felt by the EU to warrant particular action. However, a recent (2009) European Commission report, Cross-Border Consumer E-Commerce, found the market was “estimated to be worth 106 billion euros in 2006”. The report also stated that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll