header-logo header-logo

15 October 2010 / Gregory Hunt
Issue: 7437 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Consuming EU justice

Gregory Hunt provides a guide to resolving cross border consumer disputes

The internet has had many originally unthought-of consequences when it comes to international trade. Previously the closest most consumers got to purchasing overseas was either bringing home souvenirs of various sizes or being told by their local retailer that what they wanted was out of stock and would have to be “ordered from foreign parts”. Now, however, consumers often can and do cross international borders online, sometimes unwittingly, while shopping for their ideal purchases. The internet also creates an amazing research tool, one can now source a new Italian kitchen direct from Italy, send an e-mail or pick up the phone and cut out the need for a UK supplier.

X-border consumerism

In the days before virtual shopping baskets the scale of purchasing from overseas was not felt by the EU to warrant particular action. However, a recent (2009) European Commission report, Cross-Border Consumer E-Commerce, found the market was “estimated to be worth 106 billion euros in 2006”. The report also stated that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll