header-logo header-logo

04 December 2008 / Malcolm Dowden
Issue: 7348 / Categories: Features , Public , Landlord&tenant , Environment , Property
printer mail-detail

Contentious carbon?

How will the commitment to carbon reduction affect the landlord and tenant relationship? Malcolm Dowden reports

The extended Carbon Reduction Commitment (CRC) is likely to begin operation in April 2010. CRC is designed to reduce energy use. It applies to organisations that annually use more than 6,000MWh of electricity through half hourly metering—typically a £500,000 electricity bill, based on 2008 consumption. Companies and organisations aff ected by CRC will need to buy allowances, initially at a fi xed price of £12 per tonne of CO². Once CRC is in full operation, the price of allowances will be determined by auction.

The need to buy carbon allowances is expected to increase energy costs between 7% and 15%. Th ere will be an element of repayment or “recycling” with the best performers (identified in a government published league table) recovering up to 100% of the cost of their allowances. Eventually, the worst performers might recover nothing.

Effect on landlords and tenants
Where a landlord is a CRC entity, its tenants will also be aff ected.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll