header-logo header-logo

Contentious third parties

17 February 2011 / Michael Salter , Chris Bryden
Issue: 7453 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Chris Bryden & Michael Salter revisit a familiar theme

While the legal position under the Equality Act 2010 clarifies the law and puts third party harassment claims on a clearer footing, the judgment of the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) in the case of Conteh v Parking Partners Limited UKEAT/0288/10/SM is an interesting consideration of the application of the Race Relations Act 1976 to such claims, and touches upon contentions previously raised by the authors (158 NLJ, 7342, p 1474).

Facts

Ms Conteh is a black African female, born in Sierra Leone. She was employed as a customer car park attendant for a company that provided car parking facilities in various developments. On 14 March 2009, a member of marketing staff employed by St George’s, in the development served by the car parking facilities provided by Parking Partners, did not have a validated ticket to leave the car park. She was told by Conteh that she could not leave, though she in fact did so.

The next morning another member of the marketing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll