header-logo header-logo

Contentious third parties

17 February 2011 / Michael Salter , Chris Bryden
Issue: 7453 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Chris Bryden & Michael Salter revisit a familiar theme

While the legal position under the Equality Act 2010 clarifies the law and puts third party harassment claims on a clearer footing, the judgment of the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) in the case of Conteh v Parking Partners Limited UKEAT/0288/10/SM is an interesting consideration of the application of the Race Relations Act 1976 to such claims, and touches upon contentions previously raised by the authors (158 NLJ, 7342, p 1474).

Facts

Ms Conteh is a black African female, born in Sierra Leone. She was employed as a customer car park attendant for a company that provided car parking facilities in various developments. On 14 March 2009, a member of marketing staff employed by St George’s, in the development served by the car parking facilities provided by Parking Partners, did not have a validated ticket to leave the car park. She was told by Conteh that she could not leave, though she in fact did so.

The next morning another member of the marketing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll