header-logo header-logo

20 March 2015
Issue: 7645 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Contract

Tael One Partners Ltd v Morgan Stanley & Co International plc [2015] UKSC 12, [2015] All ER (D) 112 (Mar)

The Supreme Court considered the interpretation of a contractual condition forming part of Loan Market Association (LMA) standard terms and conditions for par trade transactions, in circumstances where the claimant claimed that it was entitled to be paid part of a payment premium which related to the amount of a loan which had been transferred to the defendant, to that extent that it pertained to the period prior to the transfer. The court held that the payment premium was not expressed to accrue by the reference to the lapse of time. The payment premium could not be regarded retrospectively, as having notionally accrued over the period in question.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Stone King—Laura McHugh

Stone King—Laura McHugh

Stone King strengthens Manchester presence with new partner hire

mfg Solicitors—four appointments

mfg Solicitors—four appointments

Sustained growth leads to rapid expansion of law firm’s corporate team

Bermans—James Thornton

Bermans—James Thornton

Bermans bolsters litigation team with senior hire

NEWS
A High Court ruling has sent a jolt through the legal profession after a newly qualified solicitor used an internal AI tool to produce court correspondence containing a fabricated legal citation
A significant data privacy ruling has clarified what counts as valid consent under UK data protection law
Executors may be overlooking billions of pounds in estate assets hidden in forgotten investments and misplaced share certificates
Britain’s booming non-surgical cosmetics market is operating in what some critics describe as a regulatory ‘Wild West’
Family contact disputes are becoming an increasingly prominent feature of Court of Protection litigation
back-to-top-scroll