header-logo header-logo

Contract

10 November 2011
Issue: 7489 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Rainy Sky SA and others v Kookmin Bank [2011] UKSC 50, [2011] All ER (D) 19 (Nov)

The ultimate aim of interpreting a provision in a contract, especially a commercial contract, was to determine what the parties meant by the language used, which involved ascertaining what a reasonable person would have understood the parties to have meant. The relevant reasonable person was one who had all the background knowledge which would reasonably had been available to the parties in the situation in which they had been at the time of the contract. Where the parties had used unambiguous language, the court had to apply it. It was settled law that where a term of a contract was open to more than one interpretation, it was generally appropriate to adopt the interpretation which was most consistent with business common sense. It was not required to conclude that a particular construction would produce an absurd or irrational result before proceedings to have regard to the commercial purpose of the agreement.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll