header-logo header-logo

Contract of insurance—Nature of contract

22 February 2013
Issue: 7549 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Re Digital Satellite Warranty Cover Ltd and another v Financial Services Authority [2013] All ER (D) 140 (Feb), [2013] UKSC 7

Supreme Court Lord Neuberger P, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Sumption SCJJ 13 Feb 2013

First Council Directive (EEC) 73/239 did not prevent member states from imposing wider regulations on insurance contracts including contracts for benefits in kind rather than pecuniary benefits.

Lesley Anderson QC and Lloyd Tamlyn (instructed by Brabners Chaffe Street LLP) for the appellants. Jonathan Crow QC and Charlotte Cooke (instructed by the Financial Services Authority Legal Department) for the Financial Services Authority.

The appellants were engaged in selling and performing extended warranty contracts. Under the contracts, in consideration of a periodic payment, they contracted to repair or replace satellite television dishes, digital boxes and associated equipment in the event of breakdown, malfunction or, in certain cases, physical damage. Although not accepted by the appellants, the litigation proceeded on the basis that at common law the contracts were contracts of insurance.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Chester office

Slater Heelis—Chester office

North West presence strengthened with Chester office launch

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Firm grows commercial disputes expertise with partner promotion

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

NEWS
The House of Lords has set up a select committee to examine assisted dying, which will delay the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
back-to-top-scroll