header-logo header-logo

22 August 2018
Categories: Legal News , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Contracts can be electronic

Electronic signatures are a valid way to sign formal legal contracts, the Law Commission has confirmed.

Such signatures have been subject to legal uncertainty until now.  

In a consultation paper published this week, The Electronic Execution of Documents, the Commission confirms that business can move to fully digital contracts. It calls for a government-backed industry working group to consider practical issues around electronic signatures and how these can be improved. It also asks whether the law should be reformed to allow electronic execution of deeds, with witnesses using a real-time, shared online platform to witness documents from different locations.

Stephen Lewis, Law Commissioner, said: ‘Contract law in the UK is flexible, but some businesses are still unsure if electronic signatures would satisfy legal requirements.

‘We can confirm that they do, potentially paving the way for much quicker transactions for businesses and consumers. And not only that, there’s scope, with our proposals for webcam witnesses, to do even more to make signing formal documents more convenient, speed up transactions and get business booming.’

Adam Bullion, general manager of marketing at InfoTrack, added: 'Electronic signatures are not new and are widely used amongst many organisations including banks, so it’s great to see that the legal sector has been granted approval to use this method too. I have no doubt consumers will increasingly favour this way of handling documents, particularly among home movers who are required to sign many documents and contracts when moving through a transaction. In fact, recent research revealed that home movers are demanding better ways of communicating, and within that falls the desire for information and the process to be more electronic.

'Law firms are already starting to utilise electronic signatures, but now that the Law Commission has confirmed that they meet legal requirements, we should hopefully see these become widely adopted in firms, enabling overall efficiency, increasing the speed of transactions and improving the customer experience.'

The consultation ends on 23 November 2018.

Categories: Legal News , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll