header-logo header-logo

16 August 2007
Issue: 7286 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Contracts down but more legal aid received

News

The number of people who received civil legal aid help rose to its highest level since the Legal Services Commission (LSC) was created in 2000, the LSC’s Annual Report and Accounts 2006–07 shows.

However, the number of contracts held in specific categories of law decreased by 4% overall, from 6,756 as at 31 March 2006 to 6,463 as at 31 March 2007.

New matters started rose from 783,455 in 2005–06 to 851,023 in the last year but funding certificates granted fell from 155,065 in 2005–06 to 151,247 in the last year.

In 2006–07 legal aid service providers delivered nearly 800,000 legal acts of assistance, excluding immigration and asylum, which the LSC says represents a 12.5% increase on 2005–06. Over 2.5 million acts of assistance—including criminal work—were funded overall.

For family legal aid work, fewer bills were paid in 2006–07—129,241 compared to 139,375 in 2005–06. This follows the decline in certificates issued in previous years. Gross payments in this area increased, however, as the result of an 11% increase in the average cost per case. The sharpest increase was in the cost of representing parents and children in care proceedings, up by 20% from £6,425 to £7,691.

Issue: 7286 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

Bird & Bird—Gordon Moir

Bird & Bird—Gordon Moir

London tech and comms team boosted by telecoms and regulatory hires

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll