header-logo header-logo

Controlled conditions: court documents in family proceedings

21 April 2021 / David Burrows
Issue: 7929 / Categories: Features , Family , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
46633
David Burrows outlines the extent & limitation of the court’s control of documents
  • Limitation on court’s ability to refuse release of documents.
  • Limiting access to documents: where strictly necessary.
  • Permission to appeal: compelling reasons.

The background to Re R (Children: Control of Court Documents) [2021] EWCA Civ 162, [2021] All ER (D) 58 (Feb) (12 February 2021) shows one extreme of the spectrum of the extent to which the family courts can control release of documents and other evidence in family proceedings. It also provides an opportunity to consider the narrow range of the extent to which a court can control evidence generally, and more specifically (in the case of Re R) the control of release of court documents to a party to proceedings. Normally a party to proceedings would expect to have full access to all documents in a case—as would the court or other parties to proceedings. It will only be in exceptional circumstances, that this right to access will be in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll