header-logo header-logo

Controlled conditions: court documents in family proceedings

21 April 2021 / David Burrows
Issue: 7929 / Categories: Features , Family , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
46633
David Burrows outlines the extent & limitation of the court’s control of documents
  • Limitation on court’s ability to refuse release of documents.
  • Limiting access to documents: where strictly necessary.
  • Permission to appeal: compelling reasons.

The background to Re R (Children: Control of Court Documents) [2021] EWCA Civ 162, [2021] All ER (D) 58 (Feb) (12 February 2021) shows one extreme of the spectrum of the extent to which the family courts can control release of documents and other evidence in family proceedings. It also provides an opportunity to consider the narrow range of the extent to which a court can control evidence generally, and more specifically (in the case of Re R) the control of release of court documents to a party to proceedings. Normally a party to proceedings would expect to have full access to all documents in a case—as would the court or other parties to proceedings. It will only be in exceptional circumstances, that this right to access will be in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll