header-logo header-logo

22 August 2013 / David Williams
Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

A conventional approach

williams_pic_1

David Williams QC provides an introduction to the 1996 Hague Convention

The Hague Convention on Parental Responsibility and Protection of Children (1996 Hague Convention) came into effect on 1 November 2012 after a very long gestation period. Its entry into force represents another step towards a common approach in the international family law community on issues such as jurisdiction, reciprocal enforcement and co-operation. Like its half-sibling, EC Regulation 2201/2003 (BIIR), with which it shares much of its genetic make-up, it covers public and private law cases, abduction situations and placement of children abroad. Although much of its content is already covered in the EU by BIIR there are significant members of the international legal community outside the EU who are now covered and in some narrow areas the 1996 Hague Convention covers issues that BIIR does not. 

Origins

The 1996 Hague Convention, is the third in a line of Conventions set up with the same fundamental purpose of ensuring the protection of children in international situations. It replaces the 1961 Convention which gave rise

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll